EVE Search - What is happening in MSHD

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

What is happening in MSHD

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.13 08:22:00 - [1] Originally by: Nightborder ownage details here Oh god, are you being serious? Well done for killing some AF's send in a comedy gang. How you faring against other kind of GBC gangs? How are Pure, Iron, and Hydra these days? ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.13 11:31:00 - [2] Originally by: Plague Black Originally by: Shubs Originally by: Nightborder ownage details here Just incase you dont know... that only shows MM losses on a MM board ^^... i would like to see the day a NC entinty does a "AF" or "Drake" roam just for the fun of the game... but you guys take the game far to seriously Look who's talking. Ze nano-cloak-bunnyhopping-omgitshootsbackrunforyourlife alliance member. Go cloak somewhere and keep quiet when big boys are playing. Now some serious questions to GBC. Does your morale suck so bad that you need to go out and suicide 300 ships just to entertain your members? Or was this just another attempt at some jammers using different approach then BS gangs you were sending for days now? Maybe you ran out of T1 fitted battleships so you need to fly frigs now? "Thank you, come again". Priceless. I could not have done it better if I had placed an alt in the NC with the specific goal of making them look like idiots on COAD. I demand more! ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.14 08:04:00 - [3] Originally by: General Windypops Originally by: General Windypops snip Posting with an unidentified character and characters in NPC corporations in this forum is prohibited. If you wish to participate in the discussions here, be sure to have your corporation and or alliance status ticked in your forum settings. Additionally, using an Alt Corp to post is also not permitted-Navigator([email protected]) Oh for heaven's sake, are you not aware of my epic recent success against my mortal foes? Aaargh - my frigate backbone! I nearly had him :( If they're giving you 'alt corp' problems I'll accept your app ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.15 09:59:00 - [4] These wonderfully bitter, dying gasps of the NC will keep me warm this Autumn. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.15 13:13:00 - [5] Originally by: DTCore Edited by: DTCore on 15/09/2008 13:10:57 Originally by: Aut Nihil I seem to recall similar remarks when you were rotating in VFK If you want to I have some more material for you: NC vs GBC (bigger then 10vs10 enounters only): MSHD 12.09. - 399 confirmed kills / around 60 confirmed losses - 7 billion isk damage inficlted on GBC and NC gets to loot the field D7 13.09. - 22 kills / 2 losses - 1 billion damage, NC loots the field H-W 13.09. - 128 kills / 40 losses - 9 billion damage, NC loots D7 13.09. - 22 kills / 0 losses - 1 billion damage, NC loots WH 14.09. - 76 kills / 15 losses - 4 billion damage, NC loots MSHD 15.09.- 10 kills / 0 losses - 1 billion damage, NC loots That would come to around over 600 vs 100 losses with NC looting the field every time in 3 days and GBC taking over 15 billion damage in fleet ships only (remember that bob pets do not have reimbursement program). And that only what killboards tell us. ULTIMATE COMEDY! I hear GBC pilots belly laughing at their current performance!! And I give them full right, it is funny, almost ridiculous. lol I hope you understand that all you are doing is motivating BoB to wipe the NC off the face of the map. Are you a boB alt? PS- How long does the GBC have to moon mine Pure Blind, Fade, Dek and Vale to recover all that ISK? A week? ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.15 13:33:00 - [6] Edited by: Butter Dog on 15/09/2008 13:33:29 Originally by: DTCore Originally by: Butter Dog I hope you understand that all you are doing is motivating BoB to wipe the NC off the face of the map. Are you a boB alt? PS- How long does the GBC have to moon mine Pure Blind, Fade, Dek and Vale to recover all that ISK? A week? If they are not motivated by the embaressment they are my posts will not help. Maybe another comedy gang? T2 haulers perhaps? Also, does every corp in GBC get the share of the moon mining bob has taken alone? I doubt it. It is only a matter of time when pets will start moving back to rat and do missions to be able to follow GBC great leaders into lemming runs. NC gets accused of hiding isk from their members by bob, alliance that sits on trilions of isk and yet lets it's allies suffer on their own. And when pets get invaded the only message they will get from bob leadership will be "DIE". Just like FIX or other ex-meatshield alliances. Too bad some people have such short memory to remember what kind or ally bob is. And you wonder why is NC holding togehter for so long. Alliances based on friendhips and common goals last much longer then allinces based on ego of a single person. NC will be standing where it is long after bob has writen their last page in EVE history. Well, if your post is sincere then I can only congratulate the NC on their magnificant, defining victories. We'll forget all the 'MAX-FAIL' NC alt posts they made shortly before after GBC began their campaign... and shortly before IRON lost all their space, VFK fell, 5 motherships died, PURE lost Vale, and Hydra said goodbye. Because, as we all know, that losing a few conventional battles at the start of the campaign made a big difference to the GBC, and tipped the war in the NC's favour. Or I suppose could just stop posting so you don't like quite so stupid when history repeats itself. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.15 14:15:00 - [7] Edited by: Butter Dog on 15/09/2008 14:15:49 Originally by: DTCore Originally by: Butter Dog ...and Hydra said goodbye... Or I suppose could just stop posting so you don't like quite so stupid when history repeats itself. Don't tell me you made Hydra leave You really deserve a Darwin award for this post. Allow me to quote you: Originally by: Butter Dog Or I suppose could just stop posting so you don't like quite so stupid when history repeats itself. Yeah, that applies perfectly to your post. Except that you already look stupid braging about evicting Hydra. Please more comedy: BOB evicts Hydra, NC crumbles in cloud of dust, RA disbands and and Goons commit mass suicide!!! What is next you will claim. Guristas paying taxes to you?!? Ah how bitter an a dog get these day. Well done for ignoring the entire substance of my post in a desperate attempt to not look like a fool. But, i'm sorry to say that your failed troll isn't helping you avoid that ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.15 14:41:00 - [8] Originally by: DTCore Originally by: Butter Dog But, i'm sorry to say that your failed troll isn't helping you avoid that You brag with evicting Hydra and I look like a fool. Aaaaaalllriiighhhhttt!!!! And since when do your posts have any substance? Find me one and I'll frame it. No, I listed a whole stream of events which have occured after the NC bragged about 'max fail' the first time around, much like you are doing now. Taking hydra off the list, do please give us your considered thoughts on the loss of outposts, regions, moon, motherships, capitals, and a titan - all of which can be directly related to the GBC and all of which happened after silly alts like you branded max a 'failure'. And, incidentally, Hydra would never have falled if it were not for the GBC provided the distraction which prevented TRI getting uberblobbed the second they so much as stuck up a POS. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 06:54:00 - [9] Originally by: Minyme Maybe those defeats are blocked by your subconcience because you can not accept getting killed like noobs? I'm sure they're happy to lose some assault frigs if it means gaining 4 regions, countless high end moons, and getting multiple supercap kills into the bargain too. It seems a remarkably good trade. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 08:45:00 - [10] Originally by: Minyme Edited by: Minyme on 16/09/2008 08:31:38 Originally by: Butter Dog Originally by: Minyme Maybe those defeats are blocked by your subconcience because you can not accept getting killed like noobs? I'm sure they're happy to lose some assault frigs if it means gaining 4 regions, countless high end moons, and getting multiple supercap kills into the bargain too. It seems a remarkably good trade. Denial, denial, denial! Grow up and admit that they are loosing much more then just assault frigates. The count is at some 700 losses against less then 150 kills in the past week. 700 mostly t2 stuff!!!! And they (you included) don't even have the courage to say GF! NC has been giving them beating after beating and GBC still brags about being unbeatable. Those times are long gone, GBC is now a watered down version of ex-bob, and let's face it, NC has plenty of pvp-veterans who would own any GBC pilot any time of the day NOT USING METAGAMING AT ALL!!! If someone can be called "Baghdad Bob" that would be all the bobits and their suckups putting down NC victories. We all know this is part of your tactics which is now turning back on you since you can not hack into killboards and change those embaressing defeats in any way. Just learn to live with it, your time is long gone, face the truth and it will set you free. This is too much, I'm calling 'BoB alt' on you now. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 10:36:00 - [11] Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam Originally by: Butter Dog We'll forget all the 'MAX-FAIL' NC alt posts they made shortly before after GBC began their campaign... and shortly before IRON lost all their space, VFK fell, 5 motherships died, PURE lost Vale, and Hydra said goodbye. Good old Bitter Nub, crap propaganda at its best. The NC lost that part of Deklein because of their strategy. Boring camps 24/7 revealed their effect weeks after, when in times of need none was there to do it anymore. Further more, the NC lost that much space because of attacks in 3 different zones in space. No matter how they'd defend, no matter who'd defend, when facing this kind of attacks, everyone loses (and lost) here and there (aka BoB having been pushed to Delve only). I wish them a good run. I've heard of spin and don't mind a bit myself, but you're really trying too hard to polish that turd. the acid test will be how much space NC hold in 3 months I'm happy to make a sizeable ISK bet that it will be less than they do now - care to put your money where you mouth is? ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 11:15:00 - [12] Originally by: DTCore Originally by: Butter Dog I'm happy to make a sizeable ISK bet that it will be less than they do now - care to put your money where you mouth is? NC has put their ships and their assets where their mouth is, how about your ships? Jita? Even bob stages from empire or npc stations, so don't be ashamed of admitting that all you can do is forum rant. If NC is so fail what are you when you got humiliated by them? They hold space for years, and all you hold is "sad poster" award. If you call destroying 200bn of their ships 'fail' then yes, we failed ever so hard... I've always called it a phyrric victory and that point remains as salient as ever anyway, 10bn isk says they hold less space than they do now in three months time - put your money where your mouth is, or get out my CAOD ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 13:12:00 - [13] Originally by: Tearavygh Quillam You're wasting time by trying to make me bite. But well, you're wasting time anyway. The NC are a good bunch of guys, they'll do what they'll do and live peacefuly with it. Pretty neat, compared to what others do. You may as well have just posted "you're right, and I wont put my money where my mouth is". No-one cares about your sentimental NC "they're nice" posts, what has that got to do with anything? I'm just enjoying the show ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 14:28:00 - [14] Originally by: Fred0 Beating INSRG had no negative affect on us at all ... RZR lost most but the only thing that took any time to replace is the titan Good post. And since I have to spell it out: the damage it inflicted on you was showing you up. RZR and INSRG were a similar size, you were more established with Sov systems and greater ISK reserves. The damage that conflict caused to you was that it proved, once and for all to any doubters, that RZR can do nothing alone, are nothing alone, and in the wider scheme of things are a weak alliance who have only ever relied on numbers to achieve anything. Without your numbers prop, your alliance is nothing and you know it. INSRG scared you, you blobbed them with the NC, you lost far more than you gained, and then you crowed 'victory!'. Shallow, hollow, and utterly pathetic ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 14:55:00 - [15] Originally by: PooooBear Bitter Dog, you're pretty dumb. A pyrrhic victory is a victory with irreplaceable losses. You didn't inflict them irreplaceable losses, in fact, Insurgency barely managed to scar them then proceeded to lose every PR support for the "underdog" thanks to a series of terrible forum posts by you and darth solo, which switched the public opinion to "they might be underdogs but damn if they're annoying". Also Metal Dude, way to know how to read. He wasn't talking to you, nor about BoB. Actually, phyrric victory is a term used to describe not just irreplaceable losses (although it can be, and is), but overwhelming losses to achieve very little, and is commonly used in that context. Also, being lecutured on forum popularity by a goon moistens me in inappropriate places. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 15:10:00 - [16] Originally by: PooooBear Originally by: Butter Dog Actually, phyrric victory is a term used to describe not just irreplaceable losses (although it can be, and is), but overwhelming losses to achieve very little, and is commonly used in that context. No. Save the money from your EVE subscription and buy a dictionary. I think you need to learn how a dictionary works and what it is used for. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 17:23:00 - [17] Originally by: PooooBear However, the matter at hand is that BD claims that Razor achieved a Pyrrhic victory. They didn't. They just... won. If you call losing 200bn isk of ships over one dysprosium moon anything other than a Phyrric victory, you have my e-sympathies ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.16 20:15:00 - [18] Originally by: Kilostream Edited by: Kilostream on 16/09/2008 19:18:01 Originally by: Butter Dog ....Without your numbers....your alliance is nothing .... Quoted for genius value - brilliant! No, you misquoted for lulz value, knowing full well I mean 'numbers' as in the rest of the NC... but the joke really is on you ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.17 10:47:00 - [19] So thats two people who don't know what a dictionary is ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.17 13:10:00 - [20] Originally by: CHIKA QRE When INS was fighting NC I clearly remember TRI comming to help them in big numbers including supercaps. The result was a failure cascade of both INS and TRI ceasing to exist and INS loosing any credibility they ever had in EVE. Back before that TRI was involved into an intial Delve invasion that failed. Only second time, without TRI did allies do very well against BOB and got stopped by multiple titans on cyno jammers only while BOB was cornered in few systems. Nowdays we have GBC who are flying next to TRI. Will this be a turning point in tri history or will GBC fail miserably like all previous TRI allies? If I was GBC I would never fly next to TRI for anything just becouse of possible bad luck that alliance brings to its allies. TRI only helped INSRG for 1 week before internally failurecascading. This was absolutely nothing to do with the NC, but internal friction between parties no longer within TRI - caused mainly by DORM and Illumniti. TRI isn't the same as it was then, there is less emorage from the elitists in Illumniti, and there is no DORM farming moons and losing 5bn isk battleships in fleetfights. Your comparison is bsaically so flawed that it is not valid. ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05
Butter Dog Gallente The Littlest Hobos	Posted - 2008.09.17 18:17:00 - [21] this max-fail agency is wonderful PR for the NC no, really ---------- AKA 'Bitter Dog' Failing at everything he does in EvE since '05

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.